Posted on

Nevada Casinos Adopt New Regulations About Drug Use

Nevada casinos are going to have to start treating players impaired by drugs the same way they do those intoxicated by alcohol.

That means casinos who allow players visibly impaired by drugs to continue to gamble or serve them complimentary alcoholic beverages, could face heavy fines.

The changes come after the five-member Nevada Gaming Commission (NGC) officially amended its policy and regulations regarding intoxicated players earlier this month. Now, casinos will be subject to the same disciplinary standards for allowing players impaired by drugs to gamble as they are for allowing players intoxicated by alcohol to do the same.

A changing society

Commission Chairman Tony Alamo told the Las Vegas Review-Journal newspaper societal changes made the amendment necessary:

“We always want to protect a patron, and we always thought about intoxication being from alcohol. Now people can become incapacitated from drugs and alcohol. So you see we have to change even subtle things like that because of changes in society.”

Of course, the state recently legalized recreational marijuana sales, partly spurring on the policy changes. However, the changes address more than just impairment by marijuana, but both legal and illegal drugs as well.

Legal recreational marijuana sales began in Nevada on July 1, 2017. Gaming regulators have been debating how to deal with the local marijuana business and its customers ever since.

Play Online Poker With A Free Bonus From WSOP

    • $10 No Deposit100% up to $1000
    • WSOP ReviewOverall Grade A-
      • Games A
      • Support B
      • Banking A+
      • Player Value A-
    • PLAY NOW

No opposition to intoxicated player policy changes

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) held a public hearing on the impairment issue on April 4. No one spoke up in opposition to the changes or raised any concerns.

Regulators in the state have only taken disciplinary actions against casinos for the mishandling of patrons intoxicated by alcohol a handful of times. The last one was in 2016 when the commission levied a $25,000 fine on Rampart Casino at the Resort at Summerlin.

Apparently, a third party at the casino filed a complaint to the board. This after an intoxicated person was allegedly allowed to continue gambling there. State regulators investigated and imposed the $25,000 fine.

Additionally, casino and resort staff at Rampart were forced to undergo training on responsible gaming awareness and alcohol management.

The amendments may also force casinos to provide additional training for floor staff to help them better identify drug impairment.

Not just alcohol, but other drugs

According to Alamo, the new regulations will help prevent impaired people, with diminished decision-making capacity, from gambling:

“We’re concerned that we don’t want anyone to participate in gaming if they are not completely within their faculties. That could be incapacitation or intoxication that is caused by, not just alcohol, but other drugs.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

The post Nevada Casinos Adopt New Regulations About Drug Use appeared first on Play Nevada.

Posted on

Is The Illinois Lottery Pulling A Fast One On Scratch-Off Customers?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Illinois Lottery has landed itself in some hot water with players and consumer advocacy groups. It seems it has been following a policy to continue to sell scratch and win tickets even after the games’ biggest prizes have been claimed.

Allowing instant game sales to continue after top prizes are awarded is a longtime Illinois Lottery policy. The policy is outlined in the fine print on the backs of tickets. The Illinois Lottery also indicates whether top prizes for specific games are still available on its website.

However, that information is not readily available at lottery retailers. Plus, advertising slogans on the tickets themselves suggest players have a chance of winning top prizes even when they don’t.

Ticket sales continue after top prizes claimed

The Chicago Tribune newspaper conducted an investigation. It found, since October, the IL Lottery continued to sell tickets for as many as 15 instant games after the top prizes had already been claimed.

In fact, from mid-November to mid-March, more than 3 million instant game tickets, worth more than $20 million, were sold for games in which the top prizes were already claimed.

Even after all three of the game’s $15 million top prizes had already been claimed, some 26,000 $30 World Class Millions tickets worth approximately $793,000 were sold over the past five weeks. The $15 million top prize represented the highest instant payout in Illinois Lottery history.

Les Bernal is the national director of Stop Predatory Gambling. It is a consumer advocacy group opposed state-sponsored gambling altogether. Bernal told the Chicago Tribune the lottery’s policy and practices are misleading to consumers:

“If they did operate with integrity, and tell people that these top prizes might not be available, people wouldn’t buy these tickets.”

This isn’t the first time policies surrounding the lottery’s instant games have been questioned.

In 2011, Illinois hired private company Northstar Lottery Group to manage day-to-day operations.

In 2016, the Tribune reported the lottery was printing more tickets for games than ever before. It also reported the lottery was regularly pulling sales before top prizes were awarded.

Play At Golden Nugget Now With Free Signup Bonus

Players spend millions chasing prizes they can’t win

Now, the opposite is happening. Players are spending millions trying to capture top prizes they have no chance of winning. Specifically, because these prizes have already been claimed.

The Chicago Tribune interviewed several Illinois Lottery players. They all claimed they were unaware the lottery kept games available after top prizes had been awarded.  Each played the games thinking they still had a chance to win those prizes.

Is the Illinois Lottery acting irresponsibly?

Mark Gottlieb is the executive director of the Public Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University School of Law in Massachusetts. He told the Chicago Tribune the lottery may be acting irresponsibly:

“The state of Illinois probably should be more responsible than your average for-profit business in the way it administers the lottery, and that does not seem to be the case. Normally, if this was any other product, this would be the kind of consumer protection concern that the state attorney general would be investigating. But because it’s the state lottery, they’re exempt from just about all consumer protections that Illinois law would provide a consumer for any other industry.”

Camelot Illinois was named the new private manager to run the lottery last year. It will take full control July 1.

Camelot spokesperson Wendy Abrams spoke with the Chicago Tribune. She said once it takes over, Camelot plans “to work with the lottery to improve the policies and procedures that guide how these games are marketed, activated and closed at retail locations so that our players are able to make informed decisions.”

Other states, including South Carolina and Texas, do things differently. Once the top prizes are claimed, sales of instant win tickets are stopped either immediately, or after a specified period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The post Is The Illinois Lottery Pulling A Fast One On Scratch-Off Customers? appeared first on Play USA.

Posted on

The Real Story Behind The Chinese Poker App Ban

Earlier this week, the news broke that play money poker apps are to be banned in China from the beginning of June. Mainstream news outlets claimed the ban was the equivalent to “Chinese Black Friday” – but nobody clearly explained why it was such bad news. After all, they are just play money apps – or are they?