New York Considering Age Restrictions On Some Video Games

A bill introduced by six members of the New York State Assembly would require video game manufacturers to label games with randomized in-game purchases, restrict the sale of such games to persons under 18, and disclose the odds of the randomized prizes.

The summary of the bill reads:

“Requires chances of randomized in-game purchases in video games to be disclosed; requires labeling of video games with randomized in-game purchases; restricts purchasing of video games with randomized in-game purchases to those eighteen years old or older.”

The six sponsors of the bill, A 10075, are:

  • Primary sponsor: Asm. Jeffrey Dinowitz [D]
  • Sandra Galef [D]
  • Ellen Jaffee [D]
  • Rebecca Seawright [D]
  • Inez Dickens [D]
  • Vivian Cook [D]

What are loot boxes

Loot boxes landed on the government radar thanks to their prominence in the game Star Wars Battlefront II. They aren’t a new phenomenon though. Virtually every mobile app from Candy Crush to Angry Birds utilizes microtransactions to monetize their product.

Simply put, loot boxes are a shortcut in the game. Unlike the tit-for-tat purchase of more lives in Candy Crush, loot boxes are awards that contain random rewards.

Loot boxes are voluntary transactions, but game developers can make it so continued progress in some games almost necessitates their purchase.

Are loot boxes gambling?

In most cases, loot boxes fall short of a “gambling” designation, meeting only two of the three requirements:

  • Consideration: risking something of value
  • Chance: an element of uncertainty in the outcome
  • Prize: the awarding of something of value

Unless the contents of loot boxes can be sold or traded for money or something of value, they don’t meet the “Prize” criteria.

However, even if loot boxes aren’t technically gambling, calls for stiffer regulation are growing stronger, and not just in New York.

New York is not alone

Amid this growing concern, EA, the maker of Star Wars Battlefront II, pulled loot boxes from the game. However, the company is now considering reinstating them.

That’s a decision it might want to reconsider.

In addition to New York, loot boxes have come under fire in Hawaii, Congress, and in jurisdictions around the globe.

During a Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing in February, New Hampshire Senator Maggie Hassan asked FTC nominees if they would independently review the use of loot boxes in video games.

That line of questioning came on the heels of Hassan writing to the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB) about the matter:

“I respectfully urge the ESRB to review the completeness of the board’s ratings process and policies as they relate to loot boxes and to take into account the potential harm these types of micro-transactions may have on children. I also urge the board to examine whether the design and marketing approach to loot boxes in games geared toward children is being conducted in an ethical and transparent way that adequately protects the developing minds of young children from predatory practices.”

The post New York Considering Age Restrictions On Some Video Games appeared first on Play USA.

Big Blind Ante Takes Poker World By Storm

There is a revolution taking place in tournament poker right now in the form of the big blind ante. Started by players in ARIA High Roller events, the concept has expanded to the world’s largest brands and tournaments. The debate on how to best implement the big blind ante has been a major discussion among the poker community on social media. Change doesn’t come easy in the poker world and the big blind ante has stirred up a whole bowl of it.

What exactly does the big blind ante do?

Have you ever been at a table where there are a few players who need a reminder every hand to put their ante in? The big blind ante solves that issue. Usually tied to the size of the big blind (ex. 2,000/4,000/4,000), the big blind antes for the everyone at the table each hand. The math of the game remains nearly the same.

There are a few small improvements in gameplay the big blind ante solves. Gone are the pesky T25 chips in starting stacks. Instead, players start with levels of 100/100/100 rather than 25/50.

The big blind ante has empirical data showing there are more hands played as a result of the format. Players across all buy-in levels enjoy it as well. Eventually, positie player feedback in High Rollers led to ARIA introducing it into $240 daily events.

Where is the big blind ante in use?

Tournaments using the big blind ante are found across America. ARIA was the first to use the format in 2017 and it has spread since then. The Wynn Poker Room introduced big blind ante across all of its events in 2018 to rave reviews from players.

The largest study of the format came in California at the L.A. Poker Classic. A field of close to 4,000 entrants used the big blind in the $350 buy-in opening event. World Poker Tour Executive Director Matt Savage found recreational players taking to the format upon putting it into play at LAPC.

Savage announced last month the WPT will be using the big blind ante in all Main Tour events come Season XVII.

The Borgata is utilizing the format for all of the Spring Poker Open in April. Seminole Hard Rock is following suit for a few events for their Showdown series next month.

Come this summer, The Venetian is putting the big blind ante into use for 16 tournaments in the DeepStack Extravaganza series from $400 single-day events all the way up to $5,000 buy-ins.

What is the controversy?

Daniel Negreanu made headlines last week over his adamant debate over a facet of the big blind ante structure. A veteran of ARIA High Rollers, Negreanu argues that the “big blind first” rule is best for players of the recreational and professional level.

“Big blind first” means that if a player is a all-in for up to or less than a covering stack when in the big blind, they are eligible to win their amount of chips multiplied by the number of players at the table.

“Ante first” in the same situation prevents a big blind from being posted and a player can only win back the chips they are all-in for, thus having zero additional equity in the hand.

Savage is a proponent of “ante first” and plans to use that definition of a rare all-in situation for the WPT.

The debate among Savage, Negreanu, and the poker community at large has netted out to a common denominator: the big blind ante is a popular choice among players.

Olivier Busquet summed up the argument for using big blind ante best when comparing to the current style of all players anteing.

Where does the trend go from here?

The big blind ante is popular across high roller events and is going to be in use at the Super High Roller Bowl and Big One for One Drop this summer. One Drop is the only World Series of Poker event to adopt the big blind ante so far but that should change come 2019.

The WSOP Circuit is tinkering with use in events and the growing popularity among players might be too much to pass up.

More venues and series are making the big blind ante the rule. SugarHouse in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is using the concept in a $150 tournament next month.

It’s only a matter of time before the days of every player putting in an ante is a thing of the past.

Lead image courtesy of World Poker Tour/Flickr

 

The post Big Blind Ante Takes Poker World By Storm appeared first on .

Poker Industry PRO: Split Hold’em: PokerStars Readies for Next Big Product Launch

The new variant appears be based on the split pot game Double Flop Hold’em, which could be the first time the game will be spread online.

PokerStars is readying to launch a poker variant dubbed Split Hold’em, according to new graphics files distributed across its global online poker client last week.

No details on Split Hold’em have been revealed. However, based on its branding and a reconstruction of the new poker table by PRO using the image assets in the client, it may be that Split Hold’em is inspired by, if not entirely based on, a common home game novelty known as Double Flop Hold’em.

Read the full article on pokerfuse →

Poker Industry PRO: PokerStars Raises Rake 20% in Low Stakes Tournaments

New pricing means approximately 2% more of a tournament entry fee now goes to the operator.

PokerStars has increased the rake across its low stakes scheduled tournaments, taking approximately 2% more of the total entry fee in rake.

The operator first announced its pricing update in a post on its corporate blog last week. It stated that MTTs with buy-ins less than $20 would see a rake increase, while its niche “Time Tourney” offering would see a rake drop.

Read the full article on pokerfuse →