{"id":23000,"date":"2019-02-28T21:07:25","date_gmt":"2019-02-28T22:07:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pokerscout.com\/?p=23000"},"modified":"2019-03-05T14:14:38","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T14:14:38","slug":"parx-ceo-takes-aim-at-online-gambling-non-pa-companies-and-mini-casinos-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pokerscout.com\/parx-ceo-takes-aim-at-online-gambling-non-pa-companies-and-mini-casinos-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Parx CEO Takes Aim At Online Gambling, Non-PA Companies, And Mini-Casinos"},"content":{"rendered":"
There are plenty of people that are not big fans of online gambling expansion in Pennsylvania. One that may sound surprising is Parx CEO, Anthony Ricci<\/strong>.<\/p>\n At a Thursday PA Gaming Control Board<\/strong> (PGCB) hearing regarding Parx Casino\u2019s license renewal, Ricci sounded off<\/a> to the board regarding just about every facet of the 2017 gambling bill.<\/p>\n That is not to say Ricci wasn\u2019t enthusing about some elements of gambling expansion. He said the casino is already reaping the benefits of Parx Sportsbook<\/strong>. When it comes to sportsbook customers, Ricci says it is a new customer the casino is very excited about:<\/p>\n \u201c[Customers] skews a little younger, it does. And people who haven\u2019t come to the casino previously, so we\u2019re pleased about that. It\u2019s attracting a different audience. That\u2019s why we want to proceed with the construction of a permanent sportsbook as an attraction to draw people in, particularly during football season.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Ricci did admit that these new people at Parx are not interested<\/strong> in every gaming offering.<\/p>\n \u201cThat sports bettor isn\u2019t a slots customer,\u201d he said. \u201cThey could be tables games or poker though.\u201d<\/p>\n When asked about potential cannibalization<\/strong> of these new sportsbook customers, Ricci was happy to paint a worst-case scenario that indicted multiple pieces of gambling expansion.<\/p>\n First, he came after online betting:<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s a legitimate concern\u2026It\u2019s not something Bob Green and I were advocating for because you\u2019re combining what is potentially one addictive behavior with another addictive behavior on a cell phone. But that\u2019s the law now. It\u2019s our industry, we have to compete as well as we can.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Ricci went on to compare the plight of retail stores like J.C. Penney<\/strong> going out of business in the era of online shopping to what might befall Parx and other casinos after mobile gaming launches.<\/p>\n Two companies that seemed to really draw his ire are the two outside entities petitioning their way into the PA online gambling market. PGCB opened up the interactive gaming license process to qualified gaming entities<\/strong> (QGEs) after there were several unused interactive licenses. Golden Nugget NJ<\/strong>, the top-performing NJ online casino, and MGM\u2019s Borgata Casino<\/strong> each applied.<\/p>\n PGCB approved the two as QGEs in January. That is not stopping Ricci from taking shots at the two groups, suggesting they may not have the state\u2019s best interests in mind:<\/p>\n \u201cOne of the concerns is that you have other operators coming into the state the way this process is conducted that may not have brick and mortar investment. All they\u2019ve got is a server and they could spend a lot of money marketing, maybe not be so intelligent in what they give a customer to attract them because there is a very low cost of entry for them and they\u2019ll take a shot. It could destabilize the situation.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\nRicci is enthusiastic about retail sports betting<\/span><\/h2>\n
Ricci sounds off on supposed cannibalization concerns<\/span><\/h2>\n
MGM and Golden Nugget subjects of criticism<\/span><\/h2>\n