{"id":3554,"date":"2018-03-27T14:49:54","date_gmt":"2018-03-27T14:49:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pokerscout.com\/?p=3554"},"modified":"2018-03-27T18:05:40","modified_gmt":"2018-03-27T18:05:40","slug":"poker-community-celebrating-weight-loss-prop-bets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pokerscout.com\/poker-community-celebrating-weight-loss-prop-bets\/","title":{"rendered":"Should The Poker Community Be Celebrating Weight Loss Prop Bets?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Poker playing brothers Jamie and Matt Staples<\/strong> won a substantial amount of money this weekend, but it wasn\u2019t won at the poker tables. It was won via a prop bet.<\/p>\n Twelve months ago, the two brothers made a bet with Bill Perkins<\/strong> that they couldn\u2019t weigh within a single pound of one other in a year. Getting to that point would be no small feat, as Jamie weighed 305 pounds and Matt 134 pounds at the time of the bet. The Staples got 50-1 odds from Perkins on a $3,000 wager, meaning they would collect $150,000 if they could pull it off. And pull it off they did, with both weighing in at 188.3 pounds on Sunday.<\/p>\n Before and after:<\/p>\n 304 and 135 to both of us 188.3.<\/p>\n 115.7lb loss and 53.3lb gain.<\/p>\n We did it @MattStaplesPKR<\/a> @mikevacanti<\/a> #ultimatesweat<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/RCtidLnpBb<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Jaime Staples (@jaimestaples) March 26, 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Following the weigh-in, the Staples brothers\u2019 Twitter accounts were flooded with congratulations.<\/p>\n But not everyone felt the achievement should be celebrated by a community that complains it\u2019s unfairly labeled as gambling degenerates, nor do they feel the person instigating these bets, Perkins, be let off the hook for what some believe is nothing more than a wealthy person acting as a marionette for his own entertainment.<\/p>\n I’m the only one who finds it mildly disturbing for an entire community of self-proclaimed non-degenerates to celebrate the success of a young man intentionally putting on weight for money? Not nearly enough focus on the fact that one of these kids made himself LESS healthy.<\/p>\n \u2014 Matt Kaufman (@KaufmanPoker) March 26, 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n I think the rich person is doing a horrible thing regardless of outcome, for sure. But then again I feel like a person worth 9+ figures making wagers worth more money than some people make in a decade just to make people dance is a pretty great illustration of income inequality.<\/p>\n \u2014 Jimmy Fricke (@jvfricke) March 26, 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The criticisms are not without merit.<\/p>\n If the poker community wants to celebrate this type of betting it\u2019s hard to get upset at the general public looking at poker players as little more than glorified gamblers.<\/p>\n And yes, many of these bets have the ugly stink of rich people dangling money in front of people simply to make them do something they see as embarrassing \u2013 Antonio Esfandiari<\/strong> paying Lance Bradley<\/strong> $8,000 to wear the same shirt for a year<\/a> \u2014 or in some cases, dangerous things, such as the infamous running bet<\/a> between Haseeb Qureshi<\/strong> and Ashton Griffin<\/strong>.<\/p>\n I don\u2019t know what Perkins\u2019 motivations were for offering the bet, but despite some of the criticisms of Matt Staples being forced to gain weight, Jamie and Matt both looked healthy and happy at their weigh-in<\/strong>, and both seem better prepared to lead healthier lives.<\/p>\n Their risk, a combined $3,000, also made it ok for them to not achieve the goal but still come out ahead in \u201clife points\u201d if Jamie lost some weight and Matt gained some weight. The $150,000 (plus any side action) was a tempting carrot, but neither is hurting for money, and my guess is the new lifestyle benefits outweigh the $75k each pocketed in the long run.<\/p>\n Jamie lost over 100 pounds and wasn\u2019t forced to drop to any unhealthy weight<\/strong>, or engage in dangerous saunas or week-long fasts (more on this in a moment). And while Matt had to gain about 54 pounds, he gained a lot of muscle in the process and can easily adjust his diet to lose the excess bad weight he gained pretty quickly.<\/p>\n As a former 130 pounder who ate a ton and exercised like a madman to get up to 195 pounds (it took me two years though), I can tell you that the lifestyle that causes you to weigh 130 pounds is extremely unhealthy.<\/p>\n So, while not all of Matt\u2019s new weight is \u201cgood weight\u201d but a lot of it is, and he now understands how to eat and exercise to gain or lose weight and more importantly, to be healthy.<\/p>\n Does that mean the bet should be celebrated? In this case yes, but where the Staples bet may have been good clean fun, some of these bets are far riskier.<\/p>\n Perkins was also involved in a weight loss wager this year that didn\u2019t sit well with me. Around the same time as the Staples Brothers bet, Perkins offered 2+2 PokerCast<\/em> host Adam Schwartz<\/strong> $25,000 to shed 80 pounds in 10 months and keep the weight off for a period of eight weeks. Schwartz would be going from 230 to 150 to win the bet\u2026 he did.<\/p>\n If Perkins\u2019 goal was to get Schwartz motivated to lose weight he could have set the goal at a more healthy 165 pounds. Instead, Schwartz looked like hell warmed over<\/a> at each of his weigh-ins (sorry Adam but it\u2019s true), and essentially spent 10 weeks in a starved and weakened state.<\/p>\n A similarly dangerous bet occurred back in 2010 when Mike Matusow<\/strong> bet Ted Forrest<\/strong> $2 million that the 188-pound Forrest couldn\u2019t weigh less than 140 pounds by the WSOP. The 5\u201911\u201d Forrest weighed in at 138 pounds.<\/p>\n Matusow famously quipped he thought Forrest would die trying to accomplish the feat:<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
What category does the Staples bet fall into?<\/span><\/h2>\n
A dangerous game<\/span><\/h2>\n